A paper titled “To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings” authored by Athanasios Theofilatos, Apostolos Ziakopoulos, Oscar Oviedo-Trespaliacios and Andrew Timmis was recently published by the Journal of Transport & Health. The paper explores pedestrian gap acceptance decisions in urban midblock locations. Fixed effects and random-effects meta-analyses are used to investigate the overall effect of critical variables. Results indicate that a unit increase in vehicle speed decreases pedestrians’ odds of crossing by 10%, while a unit increase in temporal gap size increases the odds of crossing by 7.2 times. Each crossing attempt increases the odds of crossing more than 16 times.
accident severity alcohol buses campaigns cell phone cerebral diseases children culture cyclists data analysis distraction driving simulator education & training enforcement equipment esafety fatigue helmet impact assessment international comparisons junctions lighting lorries measures assessment mobility and transport mopeds motorcyclists motorways naturalistic driving older drivers pedestrians road fatalities road interventions road safety data rural roads safety assessment safety equipment seat belt speed strategy traffic urban safety weather work related safety young drivers